CHECK IT OUT...

Yamaha Raptor 350 & Warrior Forum

Help Support Yamaha Raptor 350 & Warrior Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
[quote:gtkap163]Looks great, but May I ask why a warrior?

same to you?...why a z?

sick warrior man, you can be the next bill ballance with a warrior (like the bill version in the 350class)

what one are you in C?[/quote:gtkap163]
Becuase its cheaper then a 450, and can be competetively ridden in any element.....
 
so can a warrior...and it is alot cheaper than a 450
Sorry, but you'll see in a race a warrior cant be ridden competetively when the bigger bikesd come in, its good for its class, but it gets beat on every front eventuallly.
 
Sorry, but you'll see in a race a warrior cant be ridden competetively when the bigger bikesd come in, its good for its class, but it gets beat on every front eventuallly.

yea it is true for the bigger bikes like 450s but like 400ex and z's their about the same cz i ride with them all the time at tracks and i ride a warrior but until you start droppin thousands of dollars in the motors and stuff like that then i could see where ur comin from lol.
 
[quote:kfz4sgko]so can a warrior...and it is alot cheaper than a 450
Sorry, but you'll see in a race a warrior cant be ridden competetively when the bigger bikesd come in, its good for its class, but it gets beat on every front eventuallly.[/quote:kfz4sgko]

yeah so is the z....im sure there are many things that can beat it on the track
 
O and warriorspeed said compeat not win. Der!!!
Dude, A stock warrior, ****, even a modded warrior cant compete in the same class as a z,kfx, dvx. I use to ride a ******* warrior, one bone stock and one with a **** load of engine mods, I know damn well what they are capable of, And no matter how good they are in the trails, they will be beaten by a stock bike DESIGNED to be better. On the track yes, their are things that will beat a z, the yfz's 450r's and lt-r's are much faster, but that extra 50 cc's doesnt come too handy when youre faster then the rider next to you, now you may argue, "well the 50cc difference from a warrio to a z isnt that much. When you weigh as much as a raptor 660, with half the power, you feel it. I', so sick and tired of people bashing on quads( MINES MOSTLY) saying how much better then quad is, I know im outnumbered greatly on this site by warrior owners but **** man, grow the **** up and be more realistic. Stop this childish bashing, and In my defense, since I know someone is gonna say I started this fight, I only asked why he modded the **** out of that warrior becuase I figured he could have had any bike he wanted form seeing all the **** he had on it. I never onced talked down to his warrior, its sexy as hell, I have no reason to cut down on it.
 
here in the missouri Harescramble series they have what they call a 2-3-4.. which is up 200cc two stroke and 350cc four strokes.. So I set real pretty in that class nexted to all the other warrior...

I tell you what I get alot of looks in that class.. most of the time everyones trying to just figure out what the hell it is..
 
Oooh....pretty! lol Nice Warrior. How's it run?

Runs pretty good... a run mixed turbo blue with 93... ;) I don't know if it make a big difference or not.. but it smells good... ;D The only thing is I just want to get some more power out of it.. some people think a carb would do the trick.. but I don't know what to do...
 
sweet looking bike man i love the orange plastic
im in the same boat with the power and i am thinking cam, springs, porting and carb
 
[quote:520ifnj3]O and warriorspeed said compeat not win. Der!!!
Dude, A stock warrior, ****, even a modded warrior cant compete in the same class as a z,kfx, dvx. I use to ride a ******* warrior, one bone stock and one with a **** load of engine mods, I know damn well what they are capable of, And no matter how good they are in the trails, they will be beaten by a stock bike DESIGNED to be better. On the track yes, their are things that will beat a z, the yfz's 450r's and lt-r's are much faster, but that extra 50 cc's doesnt come too handy when youre faster then the rider next to you, now you may argue, "well the 50cc difference from a warrio to a z isnt that much. When you weigh as much as a raptor 660, with half the power, you feel it. I', so sick and tired of people bashing on quads( MINES MOSTLY) saying how much better then quad is, I know im outnumbered greatly on this site by warrior owners but **** man, grow the **** up and be more realistic. Stop this childish bashing, and In my defense, since I know someone is gonna say I started this fight, I only asked why he modded the **** out of that warrior becuase I figured he could have had any bike he wanted form seeing all the **** he had on it. I never onced talked down to his warrior, its sexy as hell, I have no reason to cut down on it.[/quote:520ifnj3]

Klutch im not trying to start anything we have faught enough over the warrior/z situation. I was just saying that it can compeat, hell any bike can compeat in any compition its a matter of winning or coming in dead last. I know the z is better then the warrior and we went over this already for like a month strait, im not bashing on your z anymore and what i said earlyer had nothing to do with your z i was just saying that a warrior can compeat and not just the warrior i ment to say any bike can compeat its a matter of winning or losing as i said earlyer. Sorry if you took it the wrong way but i wasnt bashing on the z i dont think i have even menchined the z since this post since our last argument.
 
i agree that most any bike can compete in any comp
if you think about it the z SHOULD be a better bike than the warrior because of the 10 or more years of technology that they have in them
the warrior has pretty much been the same since they were first built
 
Back
Top