DeathShadow
Well-Known Member
[quote:4dgc71et]
Bottom line if you ride hard you have experienced at one point or another a life threatening or possibly severely injuring moment. If you have not had a moment that hasn't scared you or taught you to wear that level of protective gear you have not yet ridden "hard" or advanced; you are a "trail blazer".
thats not true.. you can ride hard and not have a moment that scared you or has tought you to wear protective gear.. i ride hard ive had a moment that almost killed me but i wasnt riding hard then. just tryed to skip a flooded crick : and didnt work.. just because you havent crashed hard doesnt mean your not a good rider. now yes any rider will have their fair share of crashes. and a person that hits huge jumps obviously has a better chance of getting hurt. but you can have some dumb ass rider hit a huge jump not knowin wht hes doing and crash. so that must mean hes a good rider ??? right by wht your saying? [/quote:4dgc71et]
No... I was using "crashes" as a depictive analytical paraphrase; as you become more experienced and attempt new things you also experience the more dangerous sides of the sport leading the more smart people to seek out better protection. Thus most of the time as a beginner rider with out this "crash" or fear of crash experience they tend not to seek protection past a helmet... As you become more involved in the sport and become hurt or damn near hurt you desire better protection. I never used "crashes" to distinguish a definite character/skill of rider; just used along the lines and in relation to a persons riding level directly linking it to a type of "parallel" similitude - as an analogy.
So does wearing full riding gear and crashing make you a good rider? No... That is not what I said. But is full gear more common among the more experienced riders that have been involved in bad crashes and those "uncontrollable variables"; the ones that do hit the big jumps and hill climbs - yes.
Do all people with that skill wear it? No. But that makes them a "bad" rider because he isn't a "smart" rider; he will **** up one day and be a dead rider...
I don't see to many above intermediate riders (or smart ones) on the trail wearing close to or over $1,000.00 in full protective gear just because it looks cool... They wear it with the intention of using it - this defining most peoples riding skill based on the gear.
You completely missed the point and only translated to yourself the black and white meaning of my writing. I don't expect you or many people to understand though (Kreed did, kudos - w00t!)...
Capiche'?